I have a new-to-me used bike. It is a 2017 Trek Silque. It is the newest bike I now own. I bought it after a recent ride when the bursitis in my shoulders was starting to bother me again. A couple of years ago I spent several months in physical therapy to relieve the bursitis. I don't want to do that again.
How did I get to this point?
My first "good" bike was a Trek 520 that I bought, I think sometime in the mid 1990's. I can narrow the year down by the paint color, according to Vintage-Trek.com
92, black forest green with gold decals
93, black forest green with gold decals
94, black forest green with gold decals
95, black forest green with gold decals
What's wrong with this bike? Almost nothing. It has every feature I need to fit me perfectly for a touring bike. The top tube is a little bit too long for me because the top bar was sized for someone with longer arms. The 520 is a unisex bike. The longer frame is supposed to absorb more road shock for long days in the saddle. The frame says it is a 48 cm. I had a new stem for the handlebars put on to bring the handlebars closer, to attempt to correct the situation, but it's still not right.
After my hips started bothering me, when I still lived in Michigan, I visited another Trek dealer and got a mint-green Electra. This bike has the pedals more forward, the pedaling position is more upright. It is like bicycling in an easy chair. My hips got worse, (not from the bike, from sitting too much at work.) and I needed a hip replacement (or three.) I didn't ride it a lot, but I did ride it, in between hip and knee replacement surgeries. My first 40-mile charity ride in Grand Rapids was on this bike. The news media took my picture. No one could believe I would bring that bike on a long ride. It's a heavy bike, but comfortable. I ride it on "slow-roll" rides. It is also good on gravel roads.
I found an ancient Schwinn Collegiate at a garage sale for $5. It felt a lot like the Sears bike I had as a kid. It's very comfortable. But it's a 3-speed, it's rusty, and I don't trust it a lot. I keep it at our farm for an "emergency" bike if I need a bike ride. I did buy a new basket for it. The basket cost more than the bike, including the new tires.
A few years ago I decided to find another bike. I found a Women's Specific Design (WSD) Trek Madone for sale near me with a 47 cm carbon fiber frame. I believe it is from 2010, according to the paint color. The Madone is a racing bike. I am a slow rider. The riding position is pedals to the rear, shoulders forward. It is a stiff bike, there is a lot of power transfer to the bike. I've been riding it all summer, alternating with the 520. It fits me better. But my shoulders are still sore. As a racing bike, it doesn't have a rack for panniers. I tried using one from Arkel that mounts on the seat post, but on the first ride, the rack rubbed on the back tire. I tried to adjust it and ended up ripping off the Velcro that attaches it to the seat post. So if I need to carry anything that doesn't fit in the handlebar bag, I have to put it in a back pack. The bike is really light! And it is fast.
So, when the opportunity to get this 2017 Silque bike came along, I was thinking of my shoulders, and whether I should start physical therapy again, which put me in the mood to buy it. I decided I could sell one or more of the other bikes. It's carbon fiber, and WSD. It is much newer than any of my other bikes. It's the women's version of the Domane. Trek has since eliminated this model, or rolled its features into the current Domane.
Earlier this year, I decided to take the Trek 520 on my bike ride across Ohio, and looked into replacing the front chain ring. Parts availability may become an issue soon, for the 520.
So my reasoning for why I need a new bike is:
- Parts availability
- Avoid injury or expensive physical therapy
- n+1 rule: you always need one more bike than you currently have
I've had the Silque for a week, but had not ridden it until today.
First I had to order pedals for it, as it did not come with pedals. I put my old pedals from the 520, from before I updated to Shimano Pedaling Dynamics (SPD) pedals, on it. It rained the next day, and I didn't want to get it muddy on the first trip out. Then we traveled to the farm. It was sunny there while we were driving, but rained the next day. The day we drove back it was sunny again. When we got back home, it was raining again. The good news was that the new pedals had arrived, so off went the old pedals and on went the new. Ed made me do this work, he says "You have been trained."
I could have ridden yesterday, but had some lingering anxiety over doing my first ride. So today I finally took it out. I decided to go on the local bike trail, instead of driving to a destination ride, since I assumed I would be needing to make some adjustments.
I turned around at 10.5 miles and I was very conscious of the saddle the whole way back. But all in all, it was a great ride. The electronic shifting on this bike seems very reliable, much easier than on the Madone, where sometimes I have to fight with the shifters to get into the desired gear. The disadvantage of the electronic shifting is that I will need to pay attention to the battery status before riding. Mechanical shifters always work.
The good news is that my knees are not hurting the way they were after my last ride. In another few weeks, if we have some more good weather, I may have a new favorite bike. I am thinking I may sign up for a fitting session with a certified bike fitter.
On another note, I was cleaning out some paperwork, and came across some maps I had ordered from the Ohio Department of Transportation back in the early 90's. This was prior to the existence of many paved bike or multi-use trails in Ohio. The trail I rode today, the Richland B&O trail, is 25 years old this year, and it was one of the earlier trails in Ohio. It is very interesting to compare these maps now to the routes suggested by Google. For example, here is a photo of the area around Paris, Ohio that I plan on riding soon. Or perhaps in the springtime, since it's Paris, after all? The green lines are the suggested roads for bike travel, because of light automobile traffic. Red lines suggest busier roads, to be used with caution. I don't know if ODOT still maintains a catalog of roads suitable for bike riding. That would be an interesting question to investigate.
No comments:
Post a Comment